Café Economique open discussion
When: Thursday, 20th June, 7:30 to 9:39 p.m.
Where: Upstairs at The Peacock, 11 Mansfield Road, Nottingham, NG1 3FB
Attendance is free although a voluntary contribution will be taken to help with the group’s future expenses.
Facebook event: http://www.facebook.com/events/281599081974242/
Our discussion will be based on close reading of a document called ‘PRINCIPLES FOR A NEW ECONOMY’ that can be freely downloaded here: http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/advancing_theory/principlesforaneweconomy.pdf
This, of course, is not the only document available that tries to articulate the ‘principles’ for what some would called an alternative economic order. We think, however, this acts as a good representative of the field.
If you get a chance, you could download this 3-page document beforehand and bring it along to the session.
A member of the Café Economic organising committee will act as a facilitator for the discussion.
Meeting on “The roots of Economics in Moral Philosophy: What has gone so wrong?” on Thursday 30th August at 7.30pm. A room has been booked at the International Community Centre, 61b Mansfield Road (near the junction with Woodborough Road and Mansfield Road, slightly up the hill from the Victoria Centre).
In the early 1970s the history of economic thought was dropped as a topic carried by the important academic journals and as a topic for teaching economics students. Many economists probably think that Adam Smith was the first economist. In fact economics goes back as far as Aristotle and was taught at Universities in Europe as early as 1250. This was an economic thinking developed by monks who had taken a vow of poverty and it covered issues that subsequently got forgotten or relegated to the small print and footnotes. Economists nowadays piously tell us that their subject – positive economics – describes the world as it is, not the world as it should be. In this discussion Brian Davey will show how economists strive to represent what is no more than a patently ideological belief system as a neutral “science”…